unknown |
Could not be determined |
The algorithm could not be established from the source - chosen at runtime, or decided somewhere this scan does not reach. |
288 |
bcrypt |
Quantum-safe |
A password hashing function. Grover offers only a marginal speed-up against a deliberately slow function, so quantum computing is not the concern here. |
62 |
RSASSA-PKCS1v15 |
Quantum-vulnerable |
Broken by Shor's algorithm on a cryptographically relevant quantum computer. The v1.5 signature scheme of RFC 8017 section 8.2 has no classical break of its own; RSA-PSS is preferred for new work, but the quantum exposure is the same for both. |
46 |
RSA |
Quantum-vulnerable |
Broken by Shor's algorithm on a cryptographically relevant quantum computer. |
38 |
PBKDF2 |
Reduced margin |
Not broken by a quantum computer, but weak against modern GPU cracking at low iteration counts, which is a present-day concern. |
32 |
SHA-256 |
Reduced margin |
Pre-image resistance falls to about 128 bits of quantum work. Adequate for most uses; SHA-384 restores the full margin where a signature must last decades. |
29 |
AES |
Reduced margin |
Grover's algorithm halves the effective strength; the parameter, not the design, is the problem. The key size was not visible at this call site, so the weaker case is assumed. |
20 |
CSPRNG |
Quantum-safe |
A cryptographically secure random number generator provided by the platform. Not weakened by a quantum computer. |
18 |
Kerberos |
Reduced margin |
Kerberos is symmetric at its core, so Shor does not break it. The surrounding PKINIT certificate flow is public-key and does fall. |
16 |
ECDSA |
Quantum-vulnerable |
Broken by Shor's algorithm on a cryptographically relevant quantum computer. |
11 |
HMAC |
Quantum-safe |
A keyed MAC is not affected by Shor and only marginally by Grover. |
6 |
RSA-1024 |
Already broken |
A modulus of 1024 bits or less is below the NIST SP 800-57 floor and is within reach of classical factorisation. Shor is not the nearest problem here. |
4 |
scrypt |
Quantum-safe |
No known quantum algorithm changes the security margin. |
3 |
Ed25519 |
Quantum-vulnerable |
Broken by Shor's algorithm on a cryptographically relevant quantum computer. |
3 |
RSA-PSS |
Quantum-vulnerable |
Broken by Shor's algorithm on a cryptographically relevant quantum computer. |
3 |
SHA-224 |
Reduced margin |
Grover's algorithm halves the effective strength; the parameter, not the design, is the problem. |
3 |
EC |
Quantum-vulnerable |
An elliptic-curve key pair. The source does not say whether it signs or agrees a shared secret, and the curve alone cannot: the same curve serves both. |
2 |
SHA-1 |
Already broken |
SHAttered and subsequent work produced practical collisions; NIST withdrew SHA-1 in 2030 guidance and it is already unacceptable for signatures. |
2 |
Argon2 |
Quantum-safe |
The current recommended password hashing function. Not affected by Shor, and memory-hard against Grover. |
2 |
RSA-OAEP |
Quantum-vulnerable |
Broken by Shor's algorithm on a cryptographically relevant quantum computer. |
2 |
MD5 |
Already broken |
Practical chosen-prefix collisions exist; MD5 has no remaining security as a digest. |
1 |
SHA-384 |
Quantum-safe |
No known quantum algorithm changes the security margin. |
1 |
SHA-512 |
Quantum-safe |
No known quantum algorithm changes the security margin. |
1 |