google/conscrypt
9add7ce543a6
(5 days ago)
→
c5285366227a
(2 hours ago)
| Measure | Before | After | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Findings to address | 1084 | 1085 | +1 |
| Quantum-vulnerable locations | 785 | 787 | +2 |
| Quantum-safe locations | 252 | 290 | +38 |
| Key establishment | 556 | 556 | - |
| Files scanned | 531 | 538 | +7 |
Added
Present in the later scan and not in the earlier one.
| Finding | Assessment | Before | After |
|---|---|---|---|
SHA-1
Broken hash function · py.hashlib.weak
|
Already broken | 0 | 1 |
ChaCha20-Poly1305
Classical public-key cipher through the JCA · java.cipher
|
Quantum-safe | 0 | 17 |
Count changed
The same finding, in a different number of places.
| Finding | Assessment | Before | After |
|---|---|---|---|
ChaCha20-Poly1305
Key material constructed for a named algorithm · java.keyspec
|
Quantum-safe | 1 | 22 |
Unchanged
104 findings appear in both scans, in the same number of places. Each scan's own report lists them.